henbos has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc: == How to refer to "disassociated transcievers" == See [comment](https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/2445#pullrequestreview-348054866): Should we say disassociated, dissociate, unassociated, etc? Should we define its keyword where we already define **[associated](https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#rtcrtptransceiver-interface)**? Created this follow-up issue so that the discussion doesn't get lost. @jan-ivar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2455 using your GitHub accountReceived on Monday, 27 January 2020 09:54:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:49 UTC