[webrtc-pc] How to refer to "disassociated transcievers" (#2455)

henbos has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc:

== How to refer to "disassociated transcievers" ==
See [comment](https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/2445#pullrequestreview-348054866): Should we say disassociated, dissociate, unassociated, etc?
Should we define its keyword where we already define **[associated](https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#rtcrtptransceiver-interface)**?

Created this follow-up issue so that the discussion doesn't get lost. @jan-ivar 

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2455 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 27 January 2020 09:54:47 UTC