I leave discussions of the API's name to those with more experience in this field than me. I have no strong opinions in this matter, other than a mild preference for brevity. On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 9:31 AM Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com> wrote: > Isn't the document of the frame being captured there? Or do you mean it > would include nested documents? Again though, "browsing context" doesn't > capture that at all. They're just an abstract holder of a sequence of > documents, only one of which is currently active. (And depending on how > history is revamped that model might change a bit still.) > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/pull/148#issuecomment-736309506>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFIX22GBWGEOOT4YQJFHTS3SSSSUHANCNFSM4SHNXW3A> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by eladalon1983 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-screen-share/pull/148#issuecomment-736592583 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-configReceived on Tuesday, 1 December 2020 14:38:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:52 UTC