Re: [mediacapture-image] The (bool or ConstrainDouble) case for pan/tilt/zoom is unclear (#225)

> For info, here's the explanation when we introduced this pattern: [#218 (comment)](https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image/pull/218#discussion_r396258340)

The rationale seems wrong to me.
First, audio/video are media types, while PTZ are constrainable properties for the video type.
Second, it is suggested that pan: true is a faster way to say pan:{}. Well, not saying anything is an even faster way, so adding a new way to say unconstrained is inconsistent.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by guidou
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-image/issues/225#issuecomment-620514330 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2020 10:16:16 UTC