W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > April 2020

[mediacapture-record] Is there any implementer objection to supporting audio/wav mimeType? (#198)

From: guest271314 via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:01:29 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-598527763-1586710888-sysbot+gh@w3.org> 
guest271314 has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record:

== Is there any implementer objection to supporting audio/wav mimeType? ==
`"audio/wav"` `mimeType` would be useful. The topic arises not infrequently, e.g.,

- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51399121/how-to-save-int16array-buffer-to-wav-file-node-js

as to how to encode audio as WAV file, and conversely, how to decode WAV or PCM without WAV header to `Float32Array`

- https://github.com/WebAudio/web-audio-api-v2/issues/63 

Before file bugs at browsers requesting support for `audio/wav` `mimeType` is there any implementer objection to supporting `audio/wav` `mimeType`?

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-record/issues/198 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 12 April 2020 17:01:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:50 UTC