Re: [mediacapture-record] more "Privacy and Security Considerations" text (#165)

This doesn't seem to address @npdoty 's concerns above, specifically:

> I wasn't clear on what the suggested mitigations were for "default values". Could you explain that further?
> The first example, which immediately follows the privacy and security considerations section, is an example that explicitly shows how to enumerate the UA's supported types, which seems like an explicitly bad practice and isn't showing an example driven by functionality. Limiting the number of type supported checks might be a good mitigation to recommend to those UAs that are going to support a diversity of types.

Is this intentional?  Does the WG disagree with the assessment / suggestion?

GitHub Notification of comment by pes10k
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2020 22:00:29 UTC