Re: [webrtc-pc] Add adaptivePtime to RTCConfiguration (#2309)

Discussion during meeting:
- Somewhat related: ptime should be [at risk](https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2311), if it is removed then we don't have to specify which value takes priority if both are specified.
- The feeling was that this makes sense but that we should use a boolean.
- Considering WebRTC 1.0 is reaching PR and features not implemented by multiple browsers are at risk, this should be defined in an extension spec.
- To decide in the extension spec: Should this be a parameter (setParameters() on a per-sender basis) or an RTCConfiguration?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by henbos
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/2309#issuecomment-535546639 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 26 September 2019 15:03:34 UTC