Thursday, 31 January 2019
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] It is not clear that RTCErrorDetailType is referencing things defined in another repo (#2083)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices is exposing devices labels for origins that are granted access once (#563)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from getTransceivers() (#2092)
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- [mediacapture-main] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- Closed: [mediacapture-main] Should getUserMedia promise be resolved only on pages that have focus (#560)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Define ownAudioCancellation (#94)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from getTransceivers() (#2092)
- [webrtc-pc] Remove stopped transceivers from getTransceivers() (#2092)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- [webrtc-pc] Update WebIDL reference in Terminology (#2091)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Make RTCError inherit from DOMException? (#2082)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Order of RTCRtpSendParameters.encodings is not described (#1896)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Don't require RTCRtpContributingSource.audioLevel to be present in some cases (#2046)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Define ownAudioCancellation (#94)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCError extends DOMException (#2089)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarifying how the simulcast envelope is created. (#2081)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Describe how RIDs are added to a media section (#2071)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Indicate where idp- errors are used.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] It is not clear that RTCErrorDetailType is referencing things defined in another repo (#2083)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCError extends DOMException (#2084)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCError extends DOMException (#2089)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCError extends DOMException
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices is exposing devices labels for origins that are granted access once (#563)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
Wednesday, 30 January 2019
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] InvalidModificationError should be listed in section 4.3. Exception Summary (#163)
- [mediacapture-record] new commits pushed by yellowdoge
- [mediacapture-record] Pull Request: Added entry on InvalidModificationError; addresses #163
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Should a dataavailable event be dispatched in case there is no available data (#153)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Should a dataavailable event be dispatched in case there is no available data (#153)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Audio is said to be optional but there's one place that implies that it is not (#101)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] iceConnectionState, selectedCandidatePair and races in Chrome Canary (#2088)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] iceConnectionState, selectedCandidatePair and races in Chrome Canary (#2088)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] iceConnectionState, selectedCandidatePair and races in Chrome Canary (#2088)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] iceConnectionState, selectedCandidatePair and races in Chrome Canary (#2088)
Tuesday, 29 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Valid RID values mismatch between specs (#2013)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Effect of RTCRtpSendParameters on Simulcast (#2085)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCError extends DOMException (#2084)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] iceConnectionState, selectedCandidatePair and races in Chrome Canary (#2088)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] iceConnectionState, selectedCandidatePair and races in Chrome Canary (#2088)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCError extends DOMException (#2084)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] iceConnectionState, selectedCandidatePair and races in Chrome Canary (#2088)
- [webrtc-pc] iceConnectionState, selectedCandidatePair and races in Chrome Canary (#2088)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
Monday, 28 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Capturing audio-only (#100)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- [webrtc-pc] Need something such as rtpSender.reset() (#2087)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] WHATWG streams for data channel messages (#1732)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] WHATWG streams for data channel messages (#1732)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
Saturday, 26 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- [mediacapture-record] InvalidModificationError should be listed in section 4.3. Exception Summary (#163)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Recording a stream while adding/removing a track is not well defined (#151)
- [mediacapture-record] Pull Request: Do not discard data in case track set change
Friday, 25 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Fix nonsense s/active document/responsible document/ in devicechange (editorial)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices can be used to track user devices in background pages (#561)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: MAY defer getUserMedia until page has focus.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should getUserMedia promise be resolved only on pages that have focus (#560)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] respec warnings (#98)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Add missing references for external definitions
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] respec warnings (#98)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- [webrtc-pc] (How) does SCTP handle CPU-bound congestion on JavaScript thread? (#2086)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices can be used to track user devices in background pages (#561)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should getUserMedia promise be resolved only on pages that have focus (#560)
- [mediacapture-main] Should a devicechange event be fired when the list of devices stays the same (#565)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Recording a stream while adding/removing a track is not well defined (#151)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Recording a stream while adding/removing a track is not well defined (#151)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
Thursday, 24 January 2019
- Re: [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices can be used to track user devices in background pages (#561)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices can be used to track user devices in background pages (#561)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Pull Request: Attempted fix for boolean errors
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Mitigate fingerprinting from OverconstrainedError in gUM().
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Effect of RTCRtpSendParameters on Simulcast
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] setCodecPreferences and RTX / RED / FEC codecs (#2028)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Simulcast alternative layers do not have an API surface. (#2061)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Mismatch between RID restrictions and RTPEncodingParameters (#2054)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Do simulcast offers need to contain RIDs of all streams in both directions? (#2053)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Required encoding types? (#145)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Required encoding types? (#145)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Clarify how codecs should be prioritized. (#2009)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Simulcast SDP clarifications (#2075)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Effect of RTCRtpSendParameters on Simulcast (#2073)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Describe how RIDs are added to a media section (#2071)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] setCodecPreferences and RTX / RED / FEC codecs (#2069)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCError extends DOMException
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices is exposing devices labels for origins that are granted access once (#563)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- [mediacapture-main] What constraint name should be exposed in case of a getUserMedia query with multiple failing constraints (#562)
- [mediacapture-main] enumerateDevices can be used to track user devices in background pages (#561)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
Wednesday, 23 January 2019
- [mediacapture-record] new commits pushed by yellowdoge
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Spec refers to "isolation properties" but this term is never explained (#138)
- [mediacapture-record] Pull Request: Linkify |isolation properties| and point it to webrtc-identity spec
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] Point to public-webrtc (#149)
- [mediacapture-record] new commits pushed by yellowdoge
- [mediacapture-record] Pull Request: Correct mailing list s/media-capture/webrtc/, #149
- Closed: [mediacapture-record] timeslice should not be signed (#155)
- [mediacapture-record] new commits pushed by yellowdoge
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Make MediaRecorder's start() parameter |timeslice| unsigned (#159)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- [mediacapture-record] Pull Request: Make MediaRecorder's start() parameter |timeslice| unsigned
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should getUserMedia promise be resolved only on pages that have focus (#560)
- [mediacapture-main] Should getUserMedia promise be resolved only on pages that have focus (#560)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by jan-ivar
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Missing normative steps for determining codecs (#1982)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] It is not clear that RTCErrorDetailType is referencing things defined in another repo (#2083)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Mark up duplicate definition of RTCStats dictionary (#385)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Mark up duplicate definition of RTCStats dictionary (#385)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Mark up duplicate definition of RTCStats dictionary (#385)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] add stunserverconnectionstats (#372)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] add stunserverconnectionstats (#372)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Are IdP errors used? Mention of non-existing idpLoginUrl attribute. (#2083)
- [webrtc-pc] Are IdP errors used? Mention of non-existing idpLoginUrl attribute. (#2083)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Make RTCError inherit from DOMException? (#2082)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Make RTCError inherit from DOMException? (#2082)
- Re: [mediacapture-record] Recording a stream while adding/removing a track is not well defined (#151)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Make RTCError inherit from DOMException? (#2082)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Obtain user consent for one-way media and data use cases (#2012)
- [webrtc-pc] Make RTCError inherit from DOMException? (#2082)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
Tuesday, 22 January 2019
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarifying how the simulcast envelope is created.
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] setCodecPreferences and RTX / RED / FEC codecs (#2028)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Mismatch between RID restrictions and RTPEncodingParameters (#2054)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do simulcast offers need to contain RIDs of all streams in both directions? (#2053)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Simulcast alternative layers do not have an API surface. (#2061)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove getDefaultIceServers(). (#2068)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Simulcast: Which layer gets dropped first? (#2080)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Describe how RIDs are added to a media section (#2071)
- [webrtc-pc] Simulcast: Which layer gets dropped first? (#2080)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add [[SendCodecs]] and [[ReceiveCodecs]] internal slots. (#2079)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add [[SendCodecs]] and [[ReceiveCodecs]] internal slots. (#2079)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add [[SendCodecs]] and [[ReceiveCodecs]] internal slots.
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Typo in setCodecPreferences() (#2076)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Simulcast SDP clarifications (#2075)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpReceiver.getParameters() clarification (#2032)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpReceiver.getParameters() clarification (#2032)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpReceiver.getParameters() clarification (#2032)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add note about codec preferences in an answer
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix typo in setCodecPreferences() steps
- [webrtc-pc] Typo in setCodecPreferences() (#2076)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarify how codecs should be prioritized. (#2009)
Monday, 21 January 2019
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Simulcast SDP clarifications
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Simulcast SDP clarifications
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarify how codecs should be prioritized. (#2009)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Effect of RTCRtpSendParameters on Simulcast
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [webrtc-pc] "Create an RTP sender" doesn't handle creating from SDP (#2072)
- [webrtc-pc] "Create an RTP sender" doesn't handle creating from SDP (#2072)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Describe how RIDs are added to a media section
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCErrorEvent constructor's RTCErrorEventInit parameter should be optional (#2070)
- [webrtc-pc] RTCErrorEvent constructor's RTCErrorEventInit parameter should be optional (#2070)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by henbos
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Fix capitalization mismatch in RTCRTPStreamStats
Saturday, 19 January 2019
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: setCodecPreferences and RTX / RED / FEC codecs
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Mark up duplicate definition of RTCStats dictionary (#385)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
Friday, 18 January 2019
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Remove getDefaultIceServers().
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- [mediacapture-main] Spec does no handle fingerprinting related to exposing non default capture devices (#559)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Reference draft-ietf-mmusic-rid Section 10
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Reference draft-ietf-mmusic-rid Section 10
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Add amithilbuch to assignable people (#2065)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add amithilbuch to assignable people (#2065)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Mark up duplicate definition of RTCStats dictionary (#385)
Thursday, 17 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Mark up duplicate definition of RTCStats dictionary (#385)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Mark up duplicate definition of RTCStats dictionary (#385)
- [webrtc-stats] Mark up duplicate definition of RTCStats dictionary (#385)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need to define what to do on very low bitrates (#2003)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Address corner-cases where getDisplayMedia() shows prompt only to fail afterwards. (#96)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Add clarification for overconstrained constraints evaluation. (#558)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add amithilbuch to assignable people (#2065)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Obtain user consent for one-way media and data use cases (#2012)
- [webrtc-pc] Add amithilbuch to assignable people (#2065)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] rtcpTransport should be null when multiplexing RTCP (#2057)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by alvestrand
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add description of DTLS transport error handling.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Mark dtlstransport's ICETransport attribue [SameObject]
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Mark dtlstransport's ICETransport attribue [SameObject]
Wednesday, 16 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Not clear how to set # of layers when answering an offer with a track (#2014)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Not clear how to set # of layers when answering an offer with a track (#2014)
- [webrtc-pc] Simulcast alternative layers do not have an API surface. (#2061)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] editorial: Typos in section 6.2 RTCDataChannel (#2059)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix typos in section 6.2 RTCDataChannel
- [webrtc-pc] editorial: Typos in section 6.2 RTCDataChannel (#2059)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Set rtcpTransport to null when multiplexing. (#2058)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Set rtcpTransport to null when multiplexing.
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
Tuesday, 15 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound (#384)
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Move (fir|pli|nack|sli)Count and qpSum out of baseclass to (in|out)bound
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Implementation status using torch on chrome under Windows 10 (#202)
- Closed: [mediacapture-image] Implementation status using torch on chrome under Windows 10 (#202)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Implementation status using torch on chrome under Windows 10 (#202)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] setParameters: check for number of encodings (#2016)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] setParameters: check for number of encodings (#2016)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Should RTCRtpTransceiver.setCodecPreferences() only refer to RTCRtpReceiver.getCapabilities(kind)? (#1998)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Should RTCRtpTransceiver.setCodecPreferences() only refer to RTCRtpReceiver.getCapabilities(kind)? (#1998)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Order of RTCRtpSendParameters.encodings is not described (#1896)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] rtcpTransport should be null when bundling (#2057)
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add clarification for overconstrained constraints evaluation.
- [mediacapture-main] Pull Request: Add clarification for overconstrained constraints evaluation.
- [webrtc-pc] rtcpTransport should be null when bundling (#2057)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Implementation status using torch on chrome under Windows 10 (#202)
- Re: [mediacapture-image] Implementation status using torch on chrome under Windows 10 (#202)
- [mediacapture-image] Implementation status using torch on chrome under Windows 10 (#202)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do simulcast offers need to contain RIDs of all streams in both directions? (#2053)
Monday, 14 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do simulcast offers need to contain RIDs of all streams in both directions? (#2053)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Mismatch between RID restrictions and RTPEncodingParameters (#2054)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Mismatch between RID restrictions and RTPEncodingParameters (#2054)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- [webrtc-pc] Can RTCDtlsTransport's iceTransport attribute change? (#2056)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Update the editor's list to reflect who the editors are currently (#2051)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Define what happens when you stop() an offerer tagged bundled transceiver (#2049)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Describe which m= section is offerer tagged. (#2047)
Sunday, 13 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Send transferable data (#2055)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Send transferable data (#2055)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Send transferable data (#2055)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Mismatch between RID restrictions and RTPEncodingParameters (#2054)
Saturday, 12 January 2019
- [webrtc-pc] Send transferable data (#2055)
- [webrtc-pc] Mismatch between RID restrictions and RTPEncodingParameters (#2054)
- [webrtc-pc] Do simulcast offers need to contain RIDs of all streams in both directions? (#2053)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Order of RTCRtpSendParameters.encodings is not described (#1896)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Valid RID values mismatch between specs (#2013)
Friday, 11 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-stats] video packet counters should be moved out from RTCRTPStreamStats to appropriate dictionaries (#312)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] video packet counters should be moved out from RTCRTPStreamStats to appropriate dictionaries (#312)
Thursday, 10 January 2019
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Don't require RTCRtpContributingSource.audioLevel to be present in some cases (#2046)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCPriorityType is not documented for simulcast (#1888)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCPriorityType is not documented for simulcast (#1888)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What happens when an answerer stops a transceiver that others are "bundled" on? (#1858)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Stop bundled transceivers when the offerer tagged is stopped. (#2050)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] Should we allow empty string device IDs? (#551)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Define which m= section is offerer tagged. (#2048)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Updated editor list
- [webrtc-pc] Update the editor's list to reflect who the editors are currently (#2051)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Define what happens when you stop() an offerer tagged bundled transceiver (#2049)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Describing which media description is offerer tagged. (#2001)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Stop bundled transceivers when the offerer tagged is stopped.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Describing which media description is offerer tagged. (#2001)
- [webrtc-pc] Define what happens when you stop() an offerer tagged bundled transceiver (#2049)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Define which m= section is offerer tagged.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Describing which media description is offerer tagged. (#2001)
- [webrtc-pc] Describe which m= section is offerer tagged. (#2047)
- [webrtc-pc] Don't require RTCRtpContributingSource.audioLevel to be present in some cases (#2046)