Re: [webrtc-pc] Mark RTCRtpEncodingParameters.maxFramerate as "feature at risk" (#2261)

@jan-ivar Since a Chrome "Intent to Implement" statement has been [posted for `maxFramerate`](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/SV8evGSU_dw), it is not accurate to say "there is no clear commitment from implementers."  Can we use other language, such as "while there is evidence of implementer interest, there are no known implementations"?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by aboba
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/2261#issuecomment-520578828 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 12 August 2019 20:18:47 UTC