Re: [webrtc-pc] Should we remove getDefaultIceServers?

I think it is an edge case that is not clarified enough. 
The mentioned documents gives only guide lines, but they are not specific enough that we could say so hard that such case are not included there. Like mozilla understood it correctly.
So, I don't share your strict view.
I think it could be also understand as included in enterprise use case.

Removing pre-provisioning functionality is also in conflict with 1.0 enterprise use case.

```
The WebRTC functionality will need to utilize both network specific STUN and TURN resources and STUN and TURN servers provisioned by the web application.
```

I don't want to waste more of your time on this. 
As mentioned I understand your point, that finishing 1.0 is the goal here.

I am fine to add my scenario to wbertc-nv use cases,  and cover it there.
But you should then consider also say no the same way removing this 1.0 functionality.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by misi
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/2023#issuecomment-438564771 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2018 07:29:02 UTC