- From: youennf via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 08:58:48 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
> what is the purpose of the last sentence "Implementations may decide to not expose this member."? Just a way to express the fact that some implementations do not plan to expose this member. There is no constraints whatever the form. There is some consensus between I and @juberti to make it a SHOULD. @vr000m, @lennart-csio, is that ok with you? If so, I'll update the PR accordingly. FWIW, I would tend to investigate various approaches: - Never expose this information when there is no need: no connection or connection is good. It is always possible to abuse this but would require the fingerprinter to do actual network traffic which is costly - Expose that information as part of UA information gathering, not as part of JS stats - Enable the possibility for UA to easily generate more detailed reports that a user consciously accept to give to the web application, something like an easily uploadable chrome://webrtc-internals/ -- GitHub Notification of comment by youennf Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/pull/380#issuecomment-434976105 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2018 08:58:49 UTC