- From: jan-ivar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 21:02:44 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
> I don't think that header extensions or encodings should necessarily be required for RtpReceivers. @aboba With no semantic difference between absence and empty list, requiring empty lists simplifies reading. Same argument as with `sender.getParameters()` (presumably symmetry was a design factor here). With different types for sender vs receiver, there's no longer any need to clarify what applies where, and the table is redundant. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/1807#issuecomment-374375804 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 March 2018 21:02:45 UTC