W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > January 2018

Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver woes

From: stefan hakansson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 09:03:18 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-354724412-1514883796-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1662#issuecomment-354419080 says:
>Do we need negotiation to go from "there was never a track" to "there is a track"?
(assuming `replaceTrack()` is used) I've been arguing that it should not be needed. I also note that the ["Advanced Peer-to-peer Example with Warm-up"](https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#advanced-peer-to-peer-example-with-warm-up) seems to assume it is not needed.
I do however note that it's not obvious when ┬┤ontrack┬┤ should fire (and the spec seems vague in this respect).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by stefhak
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1662#issuecomment-354724412 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2018 09:03:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:21:58 UTC