W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > April 2018

Re: [webrtc-pc] Should a signalingstatechange event be fired when closing a RTCPeerConnection?

From: Lennart Grahl via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:07:17 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-380213719-1523387236-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@jan-ivar Mhh... looking at it now, I can't quite follow you. Why would it be useful to fire the close event on the local peer when closing a data channel locally?

Furthermore, we do have the SCTP transport state (if anyone would implement it). That should be sufficient for the purpose of detecting a closed remote peer connection (technically, an aborted or shut down SCTP association), right?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by lgrahl
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1799#issuecomment-380213719 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 19:07:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:22:01 UTC