W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-logs@w3.org > October 2017

Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCQualityLimitationReason and friends

From: henbos via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 16:27:30 +0000
To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-340019637-1509121649-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Note, I wrote this (in case it got hidden by the fact that it was a comment on not the latest commit):
"Done. A side-effect of this is that having record<reason, duration> implicitly means also having the duration for "none" unless we clarify what key values are expected to be implemented for the record. I'm not sure if I should say 'the key is any value of RTCQualityLimitationReason excluding the value "none"', say that "none" is optional to map, or not say anything.

A stats member is optional to implement, but if implemented it should be spec-compliant. What about record<> types? I expect you either implement none of it or all of it, so we should be clear about whether "none" needs to be implemented I suppose? PTAL and comment about this."

GitHub Notification of comment by henbos
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/pull/270#issuecomment-340019637 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 October 2017 16:27:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:21:47 UTC