Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCQualityLimitationReason and friends

Note, I wrote this (in case it got hidden by the fact that it was a comment on not the latest commit):
"Done. A side-effect of this is that having record<reason, duration> implicitly means also having the duration for "none" unless we clarify what key values are expected to be implemented for the record. I'm not sure if I should say 'the key is any value of RTCQualityLimitationReason excluding the value "none"', say that "none" is optional to map, or not say anything.

A stats member is optional to implement, but if implemented it should be spec-compliant. What about record<> types? I expect you either implement none of it or all of it, so we should be clear about whether "none" needs to be implemented I suppose? PTAL and comment about this."

GitHub Notification of comment by henbos
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 27 October 2017 16:27:33 UTC