- From: stefan hakansson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:26:30 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
I had exactly the same thought as @alvestrand. On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Harald Alvestrand <notifications@github.com > wrote: > *@alvestrand* commented on this pull request. > ------------------------------ > > In webrtc.html > <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/994#pullrequestreview-17453099>: > > > @@ -1807,8 +1807,8 @@ > </ol> > </li> > <li> > - <p>If <code><var>candidate</var>.ufrag</code> is > - non-null, and is not equal to any ufrag present in the > + <p>If <code><var>candidate</var>.ufrag</code> is not > + missing, and is not equal to any ufrag present in the > > My hatred of double negatives is coming out. Can we say "present" instead > of "not missing"? > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/994#pullrequestreview-17453099>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABICrlIu44x2CzzZBfZAvvUCPqSqkrgPks5rT2RcgaJpZM4LjHbz> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by stefhak Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/994#issuecomment-273789400 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2017 14:26:36 UTC