- From: henbos via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:26:54 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
If a transceiver that has already been negotiated is reused for addTrack(), and addTrack() essentially just does replaceTrack(), I would assume renegotiation is not needed and the spec saying it is would be a spec bug. But if addTrack() is essentially just doing replaceTrack(), why can addTrack() be sync when replaceTrack() is said to be async? -- GitHub Notification of comment by henbos Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1662#issuecomment-354421240 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 29 December 2017 09:26:58 UTC