Re: [webrtc-pc] addTransceiver woes

I may have been rehashing some of the discussion already had in the two comments above wrt use case 1).

I didn't realize you could simply change the direction and re-negotiate. In that case starting in "recvonly" and then opting in for sending makes sense. In any case a new transceiver requires negotiation, so this does not add a negotiation that isn't already needed. Opt-in makes sense too.

I don't really have an opinion then. Why would you want to create a recvonly transceiver though?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by henbos
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/1662#issuecomment-354358227 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 28 December 2017 21:08:54 UTC