W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc-editors@w3.org > March 2016

Re: Make progress on deviceId

From: Daniel Burnett <danielcburnett@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:35:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+Enjb+fr2aSgkyh08o9CxoTopEeYBdBJe2Piwd1Xpk8R1+7Fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
Cc: "public-webrtc-editors@w3.org" <public-webrtc-editors@w3.org>
Okay, I have re-reviewed 322, 326, 328, 330, and the one or two list
comments.  I believe PR #330 is accurate with the agreements so far.  The
only remaining question (which I asked Harald in 322 just now) is whether
Harald believes more text beyond 330 is needed to make clear the
persistence properties of deviceIds.  I think we are okay with what 330
provides, but I would not object to a proposal from Harald on additional
text he believes necessary.

-- dan

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Stefan HÃ¥kansson LK <
stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Addressing mainly Dan and Harald I think:
>
> It would be very good if we could make progress on #322 [1] and #330 [2]
> for mediacapture-main (to eventually move to CR).
>
> Harald, you're assigned to [1], and I think it is a chairs question now
> on how to move forward. I'd like to stay out since I got quite involved
> and have a view on what we should do.
>
> Dan, you're assigned to review [2], but that really comes after we
> decide about [1]. Your opinion on [1] would be appreciated.
>
> Stefan
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/322
> [2] https://github.com/w3c/mediacapture-main/issues/330
>
>
Received on Friday, 25 March 2016 14:35:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:19:04 UTC