Re: Timing of editors call during Weeks of Confusion

On 03/11/2016 11:28 PM, Daniel Burnett wrote:
> I'm okay either way.  It's normally 10 am for me, which is not too
> early :)

I have made the adjustment.
Had some trouble with the calendar; apologies for the invite-spam!

>
> -- dan
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Erik Lagerway <erik@hookflash.com
> <mailto:erik@hookflash.com>> wrote:
>
>     Sleeping for one more hour would be certainly be welcome here.
>
>     *Hookflash* <http://hookflash.com/> | m 1.604.562.8647
>     <tel:1.604.562.8647> | erik@hookflash.com
>     <mailto:erik@hookflash.com> | @elagerway
>     <http://twitter.com/elagerway>
>
>     On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Harald Alvestrand
>     <harald@alvestrand.no <mailto:harald@alvestrand.no>> wrote:
>
>         I noticed today that we have our editors' call scheduled on
>         Pacific
>         time, which means that the next call will be one hour earlier for
>         editors in Europe, but at the normal time for editors in the US.
>
>         Given that it's early for people in the US, should we
>         reschedule the
>         calls to be on CET, so that the Europeans meet on the normal
>         time, and
>         the US people can sleep 1 hour longer?
>
>         (I assume we're cancelling the Maundy Thursday call.)
>
>         Harald
>
>         --
>         Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>
>
>


-- 
Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.