- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:28:19 +0100
- To: "public-webrtc-editors@w3.org" <public-webrtc-editors@w3.org>
Hi, As some of you may know, W3C has deployed over the past few months a system that allows to publish documents as official W3C technical reports without involving the W3C Webmaster [1], and that can be plugged into a github-travis workflow [2]. So far, some of the specificities of our documents (special copyright statement, joint specs) prevented us from using this system, but the last of these barriers will be removed very soon. I would thus like to propose we replace the current "editors draft" workflow, whereby the editors: * publish an "official editors" draft via an update to the gh-pages of our repos * produce and publish a frozen dated version of the same for archival. The updated workflow would replace the production of a frozen dated version in github by its automatic production and publication as a Working Draft in W3C TR space. The benefits of doing so would be: * avoid having 3 concurrent versions of "latest" for some meaning of latest (github master, github gh-pages, w3c TR); with that new approach github gh-pages and w3c TR would always be the same * less mechanical work for publishing updated editors draft Now I realize that for gUM and webrtc-pc 1.0, we expect to move to CR sooner rather than later, and since that proposal mostly makes sense for WDs at this stage, it may not matter a lot in the short term. But we already know we'll start a new cycle of WD for WebRTC-NV, and will likely need to start a new WD cycle for a next version of gUM at some point. I am thus looking for feedback from editors if they're interested in me exploring this approach further. Dom 1. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2015JanMar/0005.html 2. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2015JanMar/0034.html
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2015 14:28:39 UTC