Re: Agenda, August 20

Guys,

I am still at my conference and will likely not make it tomorrow.  I am okay with pushing the current gUM spec.
Regarding the items with my name below them, they are largely uncontroversial, but I am quite Busy (with a capital B) this week and next.  Will still try to get something done!

-- dan

On Aug 19, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:

> OK, this week I should be back on track....
> 
> Overarching items:
> - Face-to-face. What are our pain points that we have to bring there
> (for 1.0)?
> - Pushing a new media capture editors' draft
> 
> Mediacapture
> ========
> Pull requests:
> #211 Allow device capabilities to be discoverable - we may back off this
> one.
> Output is the controversial part, methinks.
> #219 Persist deviceids only after gUM permission grant - seems to have
> consensus. Is it right?
> #226 typedef MediaStreamError as an object - compound the ugliness of
> the legacy API?
>  (Will Anne object to the return of MediaStreamError?)
> #231 Answer TAG self-review - does this belong in the doc at all? List
> discussion needed?
> 
> Issues:
> 
> #118 Practical algorithm - HTA to discuss
> #127 Timeout - should classify as "not for #1"
> #189 getUserMedia({}) should be type error
> #193 Adaptive frame rate - HTA to discuss
> #198 MediaTrackCapabilities - see #211
> #212 Privacy/Security review - see #231
> #218 Persist deviceIDs - see #219
> #221 Unconnected tracks - my memory from IETF is gone. Need to refresh
> with Justin.
> #222 Clarify whether groupId is origin-unique - Stefan? (I think it is)
> #225 tracks vs sinks in section 5 - Dan, anything blocking a PR?
> #227 Update onoverconstrained event handler - Dan?
> #230 WebIDL reference needs updating - Dom seems to advise no action
> now, leave bug open.
> #232 Clone a track: "inherit" not defined (section 4.3) - I think it
> means "copy" in this case. We should change to "copy" (except for
> source, where it means "copy a reference to the same source").
> #233 "MediaStream.active" is wrong - I think this is strictly editorial
> (s/MediaStream.active/the active attribute of the mediastream object in
> 4.2.2), but someone must check, and also look for "this error repeats
> itself throughout the draft".
> 
> WebRTC
> =====
> Pull requests: 13
> 
> #29 mediadiscarded - Peter, any news?
> #236 Operations array -> chain - Adam?
> #237 ReplaceTrack - waiting for list discussion
> #240 Move certificate management section - Dan?
> #241 Transport objects - Adam? (List discussion seems to have died down,
> I think with rough consensus)
> #242 Remove SyntaxError on malformed ICE - need list discussion and
> assignee.
> #254 RTPEncodingParameters.maxBitrate - list discussion seems to say
> "this topic is complicated", but can we merge this one as "we're sure we
> need this one at least"? Stefan?
> #255 RTP Sender get capabilities - this removes the "get a blob of SDP
> that you can parse" function and adds some more pre-parsed functions. Is
> it controversial?
> #256 Fix prose on getStats() w/o selector - don't think this is quite
> right, but makes sense (t
> #258 Codec parameters
> #261 Language on ICE agent being finished - I think this is fine.
> #262 must -> MUST. Someone needs to review, then merge.
> 
> Issues: 39
> 
> I'm out of time for writing agenda. Will return to these later.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2015 22:56:16 UTC