- From: Adam Bergkvist <adam.bergkvist@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 07:00:39 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "public-webrtc-editors@w3.org" <public-webrtc-editors@w3.org>
On 2015-08-17 16:59, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > On 11/05/2015 14:32, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >> On 29/04/2015 10:27, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >>> On 24/04/2015 10:32, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >>>> Can you file a bug with them (or find a bug to attach to) saying "we >>>> need getter support"? >>> >>> I have instead filed a pull request that adds the necessary support: >>> >>> Hopefully it will be merged soon. >> >> It has been merged, and now the full set of WebIDL fragments of the >> WebRTC spec can be rendered in contiguous mode (see attachment). > > I think we lost track of this (moving our spec(s) to WebIDL contiguous > mode in ReSpec) — should we get back to this? If so, how should we > proceed? Or is that too much make-work? I'm not a big fan of the current approach to write WebIDL so I'm willing to invest some time on this. /Adam
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2015 07:01:08 UTC