W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > February 2014

RE: Attribution should have a heading, no?

From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 20:52:49 +0000
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Julee Burdekin <jburdeki@adobe.com>
CC: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <07c8213b50e34dc3967e438cb5d914c7@BL2PR03MB228.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
LGTM2

TX

E

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schepers@w3.org]
>Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 12:43 PM
>To: Julee Burdekin
>Cc: WebPlatform Public List
>Subject: Re: Attribution should have a heading, no?
>
>Hi, Julee–
>
>I agree, this looks tidier. Good call.
>
>Regards-
>-Doug
>
>On 2/7/14 3:35 PM, Julee Burdekin wrote:
>> Hi, folks:
>>
>> Playing around with the Array page, I’m finding that the attribution
>> section just gets appended to the last section in an awkward way.
>>
>> I think it should have it’s own heading. I think having one will not
>> only be better organizationally, but also will encourage folks to
>> think about giving the proper attributions to anything they might have
>added.
>>
>> Please take a look at the heading I mocked up in the Array page.[1]
>>
>> Unless someone protests, I’m going to ask Eliezer to add it.
>>
>> Julee
>> [1] http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/javascript/Array

>> -------------------
>> Julee Burdekin
>> Content Strategist
>> Adobe Web Platform
>> @adobejulee
>> julee@adobe.com
>
>

Received on Friday, 7 February 2014 20:53:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:58 UTC