Re: JS cleanup

Thanks, Max: We’ll make sure to let folks know to check the original page. Regards! Julee

-------------------
Julee Burdekin
Content Strategist
Adobe Web Platform
@adobejulee
julee@adobe.com

From: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com<mailto:maxpolk@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 9:02 AM
To: Ric <ric@webplatform.com<mailto:ric@webplatform.com>>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com<mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>>
Cc: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Subject: JS cleanup
Resent-From: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org<mailto:public-webplatform@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM

The Map was not part of the material to import. See:

https://github.com/maxpolk/msdn-js-conversion/blob/master/round-alice/JavaScript-Objects.wiki


We'll have to clean up the Function page manually, and watch out for other things like that. The linked to pages are all there, it's just adding the four or so links.


On February 4, 2014 10:02:26 PM EST, Ric <ric@webplatform.com<mailto:ric@webplatform.com>> wrote:
Are there still outstanding issues from the import?

On the object page, it is missing some information from the original page
http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/javascript/objects

I can understand removing the Vb objects, but the Map is gone as well?

Also, the function page did not import all the properties
http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/javascript/Function

It currently only shows the prototype, and this links to the wrong page.

Ric Johnson

On Feb 4, 2014, at 4:11 PM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com<mailto:Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>> wrote:

Hi All.


I have placed a preview of a blog post we’d like to publish today up for your eyes. Max Polk is the author, and he relates the works he’s done in porting the JavaScript reference from MSDN to WPD.


http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=830&preview=1&_ppp=04f4cc1741



Can some people please review this post at your earliest convenience and let me know if it looks good to you for publication?


Thanks so much,


Eliot