Re: We Need a Meeting!

Hi Richard,

To create an issue, log at project.webplatform.org, visit the Content
project page (http://project.webplatform.org/content), and click the Report
an Issue button.

~SCott



On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Renoir Boulanger <renoir@w3.org> wrote:

> Hello Richard
>
> Sorry for the no followup and thanks for participating with us.
>
> I also think it might be out of friday's meeting scope.
>
> But as Scott said, adding an issue in our issue tracker won't do harm. I
> would also suggest you link the appropriate messages thread from the list
> archive.
>
> One other thing is that we heavily rely on IRC too. You can join
> #webplatform-site on freenode.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Renoir Boulanger | Developer operations engineer
> W3C | webplatform.org
>
> http://w3.org/people/#renoirb ✪ https://renoirboulanger.com ✪ @renoirb
> ~
>
>
> Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com> wrote:
>
> Well, I think the agenda is quite full, and I'm concerned that this issue
> is somewhat beyond the scope of the discussion. The immediate purpose of
> the meeting is to gain a sense of where the project currently stands and to
> raise any issues that may impede progress.
>
> For Richard's issue, I think the best way to approach this is by first
> filing an issue in our tracker.
>
> Richard, please create a new content issue here:
>
> http://project.webplatform.org/content/planning
>
> Add the issue under Unassigned issues.
>
> We can certainly put this on the agenda for discussion, but we may not get
> to it tomorrow.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ~Scott
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard.
>>
>> Apologies for missing your original mail. Yes, this is the correct list
>> and this is the correct meeting to start the discussion. We do have a small
>> team of people to implement changes to templates, but we should discuss
>> this in the overall content discussion before implementing.
>>
>> Scott, can you add this item to the agenda? I know we're really packed
>> for tomorrow; if we can't get to it this week, we can either discuss
>> further in mail or take it up at the next meeting.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eliot
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
>> >Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 8:54 AM
>> >To: public-webplatform@w3.org
>> >Subject: Re: We Need a Meeting!
>> >
>> >I'm new to this list, so I don't know your procedures. Ten days ago, I
>> sent the
>> >following email, which attracted no response. Would it be a suitable
>> topic for
>> >discussion at your meeting?
>> >
>> >RI
>> >
>> >On 09/09/2013 14:36, Richard Ishida wrote:> Folks,  >  > I've been
>> working
>> >through the list of HTML elements and attributes  > putting in links to
>> the i18n
>> >resources we have, and have made a start on  > the CSS properties, etc.
>> It
>> >wasn't always obvious where to put those  > links - they are not really
>> like the
>> >other optional links that appear at  > the bottom of the page;
>> >internationalization information is typically an  > essential part of the
>> >information that content authors/developers need  > (as, of course, is
>> WAI
>> >info).
>> > >
>> > > I'd like to propose that the template for each page in the list of  >
>> elements,
>> >attributes, and properties, etc. include an additional  > section:
>> Universal
>> >Access.
>> > >
>> > > In this section we can add WAI, i18n and device independence tips,
>> and  >
>> >links to relevant materials.
>> > >
>> > > Is this the right list to make such suggestions? Who would take  >
>> decisions
>> >on that?
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > RI
>>
>>
>