Re: Please review WPDS blog post

Well done guys!

Google+ post already done -
https://plus.google.com/b/114879255563551049641/114879255563551049641/posts/RSMDsJeNTKb

// Nic


On 3 September 2013 10:51, Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com> wrote:

> Good suggestions, thanks again. Edited & published!
>
> Whoever owns @WebPlatform over Renoirs time off please send a tweet,
> thanks.
>
> http://blog.webplatform.org/2013/09/switzerland-doc-sprint-sets-some-new-re
> cords/
>
> *Jay
>
>
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
> Organisation: W3C
> Datum: KW 36 | Dienstag, 3. September 2013 10:34
> An: Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>
> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>, Renoir
> Boulanger <renoir@w3.org>
> Betreff: Re: Please review WPDS blog post
>
> >Hi, Jay–
> >
> >Looks good! I say publish it.
> >
> >I did think of one more optional suggestion... you could link to the
> >individual articles, so people can check them out immediately without
> >searching:
> >* 11 HTML element pages written: dl, dd, dt, s, del, ins, center, meter,
> >button, a, script
> >* 4 HTML attribute pages written: id, required, type, target
> >* 2 API pages written: VibrationAPI, Canvas Tutorial
> >
> >(And shouldn't VibrationAPI be Vibration API?)
> >
> >Regards-
> >-Doug
> >
> >On 9/3/13 4:18 AM, Andre Jay Meissner wrote:
> >> Thanks all for your reviews, specifically @Doug for setting the missing
> >> flag and pointing out the crazy 3rd person stuff that has been
> >>introduced
> >> before I set myself as the author... much better without that mention
> >> anyway! :)= Edits are made based on the tweaks below, please give it a
> >> final look so I can publish it today.
> >>
> >> Oh wait, weird!
> >> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=626&preview=1&_ppp=a4a382e9ec still
> shows
> >> the outdated version, whereas using the WordPress "Preview"
> >>functionality
> >> previews the edits I have made. Hm. I tried dis/enabling it hoping it
> >> generates a new public preview/URL, to no avail. @Renoir?
> >>
> >> (People with WP accounts, please review and approve! #ahrgh)
> >>
> >> Thanks, *Jay
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
> >> Organisation: W3C
> >> Datum: KW 36 | Dienstag, 3. September 2013 03:00
> >> An: Andre Jay Meissner <ameissne@adobe.com>
> >> Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
> >> Betreff: Re: Please review WPDS blog post
> >>
> >>> Hi, Jay, Chris­
> >>>
> >>> On 9/2/13 12:04 PM, Andre Jay Meissner wrote:
> >>>> Chris and me wrote a resume for the blog. Please review, as always it
> >>>> needs two approvers please:
> >>>> http://blog.webplatform.org/?p=626&preview=true
> >>>
> >>> This post (and Doc Sprint) looks great! Really good color.
> >>>
> >>> I suggest a couple of minor tweaks:
> >>>
> >>> * Does Andre Jay Meissner from Adobe always refer to himself in the 3rd
> >>> person? :P I'm not sure how to fix this, other than to suggest "I (
> >>> Andre Jay Meissner from Adobe) kicked off proceedings"... which also
> >>> sounds weird. Oh, well.
> >>>
> >>> * "kicked off proceedings" -> "kicked off the proceedings"
> >>>
> >>> * stuck in: in American English (such as it is), this has a negative
> >>> connotation, like they were forced to do this against their will (like,
> >>> "stuck in traffic" or "stuck in school on a Spring day"). I think in
> >>> British English, it means "to start doing something enthusiastically".
> >>> Maybe "and jumped head-first in to a variety of tasks" or something?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks again for the Doc Sprint and the report!
> >>>
> >>> Regards-
> >>> -Doug
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >  Schepers
> >W3C Developer Relations Lead
> >Project Coordinator for SVG, WebApps, Touch Events, and Audio
>
>
>