- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:48:29 +0300
- To: pdsouza <pdsouza@about.com>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABc02_KC4hEp1OgoL7pLt-Bhje+ErWGdWTfgEwwugjrcy31L6A@mail.gmail.com>
w/ is for internal/administrative MediaWiki pages, I would not use it. ☆*PhistucK* On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Patrick D'Souza <pdsouza@about.com> wrote: > I agree. How about using webplatform.org/w/some-short-thing? /w/ is > Disallowed in robots.txt although I'm not sure when and why that rule was > put in place. > > - Patrick > > > On 04/23/2013 03:40 AM, PhistucK wrote: > > I think webplatform.org/some-short-thing is too simple and can be > problematic. > It would be better if we at least prefix it somehow - > webplatform.org/*s/*some-short-thing > That would also be easier to disallow in robots.txt. > > > > ☆*PhistucK* > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Patrick D'Souza <pdsouza@about.com>wrote: > >> We could prevent any short links being indexed under webplatform.org by >> Disallowing it in robots.txt. This way we can continue to use the url >> shortener in slides etc without it being indexed. >> >> On 04/23/2013 03:11 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: >> >>> Hi, Patrick- >>> >>> As much as I appreciate Frozenice's many contributions, I feel the same >>> way about this particular issue. >>> >>> Before the launch, I bought the wpd.cc domain for the same purpose, but >>> I was afraid of just this, that it would get indexed, so I didn't really >>> promote it. I wasn't sure that it would be harmful; I'm glas that someone >>> with SEO skills can speak definitively about it. >>> >>> Lea pointed out earlier that Twitter has a fixed length for all links, >>> so the shortener isn't needed there, and in fact they use their own >>> shortener, so it would be doubly-redirected. >>> >>> I do like the idea of shortlinks like webplatform.org/apis/canvas to >>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/canvas, for links in slides, etc. >>> If Frozenice were to install his shortener on webplatform.org, would >>> that still hurt SEO? >>> >>> Regards- >>> -Doug >>> >>> >>> On 4/23/13 2:59 AM, Patrick D'Souza wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> It has been brought to my notice that wpd.mx has been setup as a url >>>> shortener for webplatform.org urls. for e.g. wpd.mx/apis/canvas 301s to >>>> http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/canvas. >>>> <http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/apis/canvas> >>>> >>>> This url has been indexed by Google and I don't like the thought of >>>> different urls pointing to the same content when a user is searching for >>>> canvas in a search engine. It dilutes the positive effects of a >>>> webplatform.org url. >>>> >>>> Sorry to be a little picky but we should avoid all such short urls which >>>> confuse a user and in turn result in duplicate content being served to >>>> search engines. I see the benefit of a url shortener as it can be useful >>>> in social media campaigns as well as brand promotion for >>>> webplatform.org. I propose we use this url shortener on webplatform.org >>>> itself for e.g. webplatform.org/font-size which would redirect to >>>> docs.webplatform.org/css/properties/font-size. Every 301 is one >>>> additional request for a user which is not good in terms of performance. >>>> I would appreciate if we avoid 301s as far as possible unless it's >>>> absolutely required. Always, keep it simple :) >>>> >>>> Any thoughts and feedback are much appreciated. >>>> >>>> - Patrick >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> -- >> Patrick D'Souza Developer, Metrics About.com | Do more 1500 Broadway, 6th >> Floor New York, NY, 10036 AIM: padsouza >> >> > > -- > Patrick D'Souza Developer, Metrics About.com | Do more 1500 Broadway, 6th > Floor New York, NY, 10036 AIM: padsouza >
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 07:49:37 UTC