Re: global nav categories (content/issues/14)

OK, I'm convinced. I updated the bug to have the sixth category be issues. J


----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee

From:  Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
Date:  Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:51 AM
To:  Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
Cc:  julee <julee@adobe.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org"
<public-webplatform@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: global nav categories (content/issues/14)

Hi Scott,

I¡¯m a bit skeptical about ¡°Bugs¡±. While it may increase bug reports, it
doesn¡¯t communicate that they can also file feature requests and ideas.
Github also uses ¡°Issues¡±, e.g. look here:
https://github.com/LeaVerou/dabblet

Cheers,
Lea

Lea Verou
W3C developer relations
http://w3.org/people/all#lea ? http://lea.verou.me ? @leaverou






On Apr 17, 2013, at 19:44, Scott Rowe wrote:

> IMHO "Bugs" or "Issues" is fine, as the two are synonymous - I even like
> "Bugs" a little better. Most of the time the visitor isn't concerned with our
> larger project management effort, but may be concerned with issues within that
> effort. Most people will recognize "Issues" as the place to go to find out
> about problems with the site and how to file them. The rest of us already know
> about project.webplatform.org <http://project.webplatform.org/> , and that the
> "Issues" link points to it is not much of a mental stretch for us.
> ~Scott
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Lea:
>> 
>> I see that http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/Main_Page and
>> http://project.webplatform.org <http://project.webplatform.org/>  are
>> updated. I didn't see the same nav on the following
>> 
>> http://www.webplatform.org <http://www.webplatform.org/>
>> http://talk.webplatform.org <http://talk.webplatform.org/>
>> http://blog.webplatform.org <http://blog.webplatform.org/>
>> 
>> Regarding "Issues" vs. "Project" -- I personally think our
>> project.webplatform.org <http://project.webplatform.org/>  site is more than
>> just a issues tracker. Specifically, I hope we continue to promote project
>> dashboards to highlight the growth and health of the site, and personal
>> dashboards as a way to encourage contributors to load up ideas and tasks for
>> themselves that they can return to. "Issues" is just too small a word for our
>> amazing implementation of The Bug Genie.
>> 
>> But I can see the advantage of being clear about where to file bugs. So, as
>> long as we have a consistent global nav across all domains, I'll leave you in
>> peace. :-)
>> 
>> Others' opinions appreciated.
>> 
>> Julee
>> ----------------------------
>> julee@adobe.com
>> @adobejulee
>> 
>> From:  Lea Verou <lea@w3.org>
>> Date:  Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:05 AM
>> To:  julee <julee@adobe.com>
>> Cc:  "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
>> Subject:  Re: global nav categories (content/issues/14)
>> 
>> Hi Julee,
>> 
>> I updated the global nav, hopefully everywhere. However, after a discussion
>> with Doug, we both agreed that while ¡°Issues¡± is not perfect, ¡°Project¡±
>> sounds confusing for most people. So, for now it¡¯s ¡°Issues¡± until we think of
>> a better title (anyone got any ideas?)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Lea
>> 
>> Lea Verou
>> W3C developer relations
>> http://w3.org/people/all#lea ? http://lea.verou.me <http://lea.verou.me/>  ?
>> @leaverou
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 9, 2013, at 17:47, Julee wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi, Lea:
>>> 
>>> Thanks for implementing the global nav on the project.* space! I saw that
>>> you added the "Issues" category. I'm wondering if we don't want to make that
>>> "Project," since we're encouraging folks to go there for their dashboard,
>>> design discussions, and so on. If that sounds good to you and others, I'll
>>> update the bug to request that we add the "Project" item to all of the
>>> global navs.
>>> 
>>> Also, I wanted to call out that we're not going to point to forums anymore,
>>> so we should update Discussion to point to http://talk.webplatform.org
>>> <http://talk.webplatform.org/> , and not http://talk.webplatform.org/forums.
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>>> 
>>> Julee
>>> ----------------------------
>>> julee@adobe.com
>>> @adobejulee
>> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 17:11:18 UTC