W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > April 2013

Re: WPD Namespace (was: Place to put bug genie documentation.)

From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:16:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHZLcPrVxukBdRL9ysE7eHqb00kGurq2XG+0tMLAUUWwFNDOYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
+1
"Meta" is cool with me.
~Scott



On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi, folks-
>
> All this talk about the "WPD:" namespace reminded me that the designation
> itself is a bit strange. I don't remember exactly why we decided to use
> that prefix (it was probably some quirk of mine), but before we go too much
> further... maybe we should change it to something a bit less opaque, so we
> don't have to explain it to people?
>
> We have the "Meta:" namespace prefix available, and that seems a bit more
> intuitive.
>
> At the risk of starting a naming debate... what would people think about
> changing "WPD:" pages to "Meta:" (with a redirect)?
>
> Regards-
> -Doug
>
> On 4/12/13 1:47 PM, Jonathan Garbee wrote:
>
>> I was thinking more along the lines of:
>> * WPD:Contributors_Guide
>> ** Editing
>> *** Getting Started
>> ** Project Mangement
>> *** Filing an issue
>> *** Voting on issues
>> *** Editing an issues attributes
>> ** Design
>>
>> With each lower level in the list simply being a sub-folder ( /
>> separator, we don't really use folders but that is the only thing I can
>> think to call it.) Doing WPD: so much just gets very repetitive very
>> quickly, and wouldn't even work doing WPD:Project_Management/WPD:**
>> Projects.
>>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 15:17:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:45 UTC