- From: Scott Rowe <scottrowe@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 08:16:51 -0700
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 15:17:20 UTC
+1 "Meta" is cool with me. ~Scott On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > Hi, folks- > > All this talk about the "WPD:" namespace reminded me that the designation > itself is a bit strange. I don't remember exactly why we decided to use > that prefix (it was probably some quirk of mine), but before we go too much > further... maybe we should change it to something a bit less opaque, so we > don't have to explain it to people? > > We have the "Meta:" namespace prefix available, and that seems a bit more > intuitive. > > At the risk of starting a naming debate... what would people think about > changing "WPD:" pages to "Meta:" (with a redirect)? > > Regards- > -Doug > > On 4/12/13 1:47 PM, Jonathan Garbee wrote: > >> I was thinking more along the lines of: >> * WPD:Contributors_Guide >> ** Editing >> *** Getting Started >> ** Project Mangement >> *** Filing an issue >> *** Voting on issues >> *** Editing an issues attributes >> ** Design >> >> With each lower level in the list simply being a sub-folder ( / >> separator, we don't really use folders but that is the only thing I can >> think to call it.) Doing WPD: so much just gets very repetitive very >> quickly, and wouldn't even work doing WPD:Project_Management/WPD:** >> Projects. >> > > > >
Received on Monday, 15 April 2013 15:17:20 UTC