Re: Translations

Regarding your last option, :zh can potentially clash with pseudo classes.

☆*PhistucK*



On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:52 PM, frozenice <frozenice@frozenice.de> wrote:

> Uhm, yeah:
>
> css/properties/border-radius?**zh is the same page as
> css/properties/border-radius, you just added a parameter.
> (I'm assuming we want translations on their own page)
>
> css/properties/border-radius/**lang:zh is still in the default namespace.
> Also there could be problems with wiki markup, don't know for sure, but
> wouldn't risk it.
> If we want people to be able to filter search results by language, that
> one does not help.
>
> css/properties/border-radius/**lang-zh seems ok from a technical
> standpoint, but doesn't look pretty. :(
>
> css/properties/border-radius/$**zh just looks wrong to me as a programmer
> :>
>
> I don't know, maybe some other char?
> css/properties/border-radius/.**zh
> css/properties/border-radius/~**zh
> css/properties/border-radius/!**zh
> css/properties/border-radius/-**zh
> css/properties/border-radius/'**zh
> css/properties/border-radius/_**zh
> css/properties/border-radius/:**zh (looks the best to me, also shouldn't
> clash with CSS stuff)
>
>
>
> On 05.12.2012 17:25, Chris Mills wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 5 Dec 2012, at 16:19, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi, Chris-
>>>
>>> On 12/5/12 10:55 AM, Chris Mills wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5 Dec 2012, at 15:50, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Hi, folks-
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, good point, Phistuck.
>>>>>
>>>>> The lang: namespace idea is interesting. Namespaces have
>>>>> implications for search, which may be a good thing... we want
>>>>> someone to be able to search within their own language (or rather,
>>>>> within any particular language). It is a bit long, though...
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris, why did you dismiss the query-string delimiter? For
>>>>> technical MediaWiki reasons, or some other reason?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I'm sorry - I didn't mean to dismiss ? - that was supposed to be
>>>> part of the previous sentence. I was only dismissing # and @
>>>>
>>>
>>> LOL... I misread your message. I agree about # and @.
>>>
>>> Since we're on the topic... what about it?
>>>
>>> Chinese: docs/webplatform.org/wiki/css/**properties/border-radius?zh<http://webplatform.org/wiki/css/properties/border-radius?zh>
>>>
>>>
>> That would work pretty well, afaics. Anyone got any ideas on why this
>> wouldn't work?
>>
>>
>