- From: Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 16:34:22 +0000
- To: Janet Swisher <jswisher@mozilla.com>, "public-webplatform@w3.org" <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CE3A5BFD1228D84A8D9C158EEC195FD53DA198E7@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntde>
Just curious. How does Wikipedia structure this? I don't know, offhand. Thanks, Eliot From: Janet Swisher [mailto:jswisher@mozilla.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:28 AM To: public-webplatform@w3.org Subject: Re: Anonymous editing trial. +1 on trying out anonymous edits. I know I was one of those who argued against it, but if we're getting pushback about it, I'm open to trying it. Just wondering (do NOT block on this): is it possible to have MW suggest that an anonymous editor (with a given IP address) create an account, after some number of edits? Kind of a "Glad you like it here -- care to introduce yourself?" thing. On 12/3/12 1:58 PM, Jonathan Garbee wrote: I think we should give anonymous editing in the docs a trial run. There have been a few who have spoken about not wanting an account to edit. Tomato has done a great job with getting some Abuse Filters in place as well. So, I think we should at least give it a shot for a while. See if anything bad happens (which probably will) but tweak the systems to take care of it mostly automatically. I understand the need to try and get a sense of community, but honestly some people just don't care. They see something wrong and want to fix it. Should we not encourage that kind of mentality as well? Thoughts? -Garbee -- Janet Swisher<mailto:jREMOVEswisher@mozilla.com> Mozilla Developer Network<https://developer.mozilla.org> Technical Writer/Community Steward
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 16:35:36 UTC