- From: PhistucK <phistuck@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:30:40 +0300
- To: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Niels Leenheer <info@html5test.com>, Ronald Mansveld <ronald@ronaldmansveld.nl>, "public-webplatform-tests@w3.org" <public-webplatform-tests@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABc02_JwErJzGsCYYpdc-TE-30XZVzREtQBMYqddDwCYVYYHOQ@mail.gmail.com>
I am not advocating for hand editing wiki compatibility tables. I am advocating for a solution for entering compatibility data as soon as possible, instead of waiting for the whole import effort to finish (unless we are talking about less than a month). (And Opera is on a fast track, too, so make that three out of five. :)) ☆*PhistucK* On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org> wrote: > On Saturday, October 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, PhistucK wrote: > > I understand it does not feel so urgent to you, but when I work on or > edit Web Platform Documentation wiki pages, I usually want to add > compatibility data (as much as possible for me) to the page (I think this > workflow makes sense). I am already reading through the subject in order to > provide accurate information, so I want the information to be as complete > as possible. > > > > Currently, there is a note that instructs the contributor not to touch > the compatibility tables, because it will be automated. Right now, we lose > data, opportunities and nice efforts due to that note. I know I avoided > entering the information because of that note, even for places where > external compatibility data would probably not have information (but who > knows?). > > > > If you intend to allow people to submit pull requests, I think it should > happen as we speak. People (me, anyway) want to help bring up this website > with any information they can possibly provide. Not supporting that right > now is a loss of a potential community effort. > > > > (Note that while the documentation should be filled with educative and > reference content, a lot of developers just want to know whether the > feature can be used, rather than how to use it, so a seemingly simple use > case is lost during this time, until this project reaches any user facing > milestone) > Hand-edited compatibility data for the Open Web Platform with two vendors > out of five releasing a new version of their browser _every six weeks_ just > won't scale. The data will become stale pretty much immediately. > > Encouraging contributors to submit data we know will shortly be > overwritten by an automated system risks alienating them from further > contributions. I think the current move (instructing contributors not to > touch that data) is the right one. > > --tobie >
Received on Saturday, 19 October 2013 12:31:48 UTC