- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:08:37 +0000
- To: public-webplatform-bugs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20208
Tomas Caspers <tcaspers@mac.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcaspers@mac.com
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Caspers <tcaspers@mac.com> ---
While going through this list here at Web Platform Doc Sprint in Berlin, we're
not sure which content from WAI should be moved over to webplatform.org and
which content should remain at W3C WAI. E.g. it says “business case stuff
probably is better left to WAI”, but then it says “"Where a11y fits into the
process"? good document for webplatform” - which to us reads like “business
case stuff”, right?
Same goes for most of the suggested articles at
http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/accessibility_article_ideas - they all seem to
be beyond scope as per the above definition and better suited for WAI.
Reason I'm asking is, we have tons of articles that originated at w3.org/wai
and that were translated from English to German (see box on the right at
http://www.einfach-fuer-alle.de/wcag2.0/) that we would like to add to
webplatform.org, and we're not sure what's appropriate and what's not.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 16:08:40 UTC