[Bug 20133] clarify policy on collapsing/removing small pages

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20133

Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cmills@w3.org

--- Comment #1 from Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org> ---
I certainly don't think there is a problem with repeating content, and indeed,
this worked for different people who want to consume the content in different
ways - some people will want to see an overview of all the PerformanceTiming
events, for example, while others will want to see single concise pages on
individual events. Different people will search for different things as well.

I can't comment on whether we could get an automated tool that would be able to
work out whether to list child pages or not. Maybe we cold err on the side of
creating the pages, then get someone to look through them in each case like
this, and decide whether to keep them all?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 08:43:37 UTC