- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 05:28:48 +0000
- To: public-webplatform-bugs@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19129 --- Comment #2 from Chris Mills <cmills@w3.org> 2012-10-01 05:28:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > We started this conversation months ago and never came to a resolution. There > are too many mobile browsers to include in a single compatibility table > (although the current set, which I just took based on what MDN had, clearly > isn't perfect). > > There are a few competing things here: > * Not wanting to overwhelm readers with way too many columns > * Not wanting to overwhelm _editors_ with way too many columns--it makes the > job look impossible and can be de-motivating > * Implementation-wise, it's very hard to set up the compatibility tables in > ways with a variable number of columns. > > Figuring out how we handle mobile compatibility tables is a good topic for the > hackathon. I appreciate these points of view, but in Opera Mini's case, it will look strange not having support info for it listed, as it is a major browser. Not in the US where everyone has a smartphone and Wifi, but in places like Russia/CIS, Africa, Eastern Europe, and Asia. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 October 2012 05:28:50 UTC