- From: Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 08:28:22 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: public-webpaymentsigcharter <public-webpaymentsigcharter@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
Hi Manu, Joseph, All Given that there seems to be a consensus on removing non-fiat. I'm happy to proceed. The easiest, at a first glance, is to just remove the term and not open another can of worms by adding a new term. I believe that the idea is very well conveyed and I feel we don't need to go further. I implemented this change (removing the problematic term). cheers Steph Le 09/09/2014 03:28, Manu Sporny a écrit : > On 09/01/2014 12:30 PM, Joseph Potvin wrote: >> RE: Doesn’t fiat imply government? >> >> If what's intended in that section of the Charter is to say >> "stateless currencies", then some variant of this phrase would be >> better. But would "Berkshares" that (I think) involve a regional >> government and some municipalites in Massachussetts be inside our >> outside that concept? http://www.berkshares.org/community_industry > > +1 to removing non-fiat. > > Perhaps changing it to "private currencies"? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_currency > > -- manu > -- Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org W3C +33 (0) 6 73 84 87 27 BP 93 F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2014 06:29:10 UTC