- From: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 11:24:47 -0400
- To: public-webpaymentsigcharter <public-webpaymentsigcharter@w3.org>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 15:25:35 UTC
I just now noticed the phrase "non-fiat money" in the second bullet point of the first section on scope, which reads in its entirety: "Non-traditional currencies (this term covers multiple cases such as the commonly called cryptocurrencies <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency>, digital currencies, virtual currencies, non-fiat money. This category is sometimes designed as "non-governmental units-of-account" by some International organizations )" The phrase "non-fiat money" is an anomaly in this otherwise precise and meaningful statement. It introduces confusion, because whether or not something is deemed by fiat to represent or to communicate value is orthogonal to whether or not it is a traditional currency instrument. Certainly, for example, BTC's reputation and reported unit value is based upon a community fiat. Tentatively I would recommend to remove "non-fiat money" with no need to replace it with anything instead.However perhaps those who recommended to include this phrase would prefer to suggest a substitute that communicates better what they intended, while also resolving the issue I'm raising here. -- Joseph Potvin Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman jpotvin@opman.ca Mobile: 819-593-5983
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 15:25:35 UTC