- From: William O'Beirne <wbobeirne@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 11:08:38 -0400
- To: Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Michael Bumann <hello@michaelbumann.com>, Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACoa5pUOcg0r9Lao3XS==0TpTovwRMAWJ5tetkAvqq0NCCne7A@mail.gmail.com>
Well consider yourself lucky Andrew, because it's written in TypeScript! I'm looking forward to integrating with whatever shakes out of the W3C payments standard, but I still think even with it, WebLN has a place in applications. I spoke to this a bit in an issue Rene had posted on the repo[1] but I'll reiterate a bit here. 1. Web payments are structured around more traditional large one-time payments for things like physical goods. One of the things I like so much about Lightning is the idea of more passive, thoughtless micro payments. I don't think that the standard or client implementations will make that a first class use case. 2. The spec considers creating new payment methods "out of scope"[2], which says to me that it'll be a long while before chrome extensions (e.g. Joule) can add a payment method to the browser. So it'll be at the whims of the browser vendors to implement Lightning (which I find unlikely), or someone will need to fork a browser that has it built in. 3. Lightning has more going for it than just payments. Invoices to receive payments and proof of identity (by providing an invoice or a signed message) are interesting tools that come with running a node that I think can make for interesting user experiences. I don't see anything like that making it into a W3C spec any time soon. All that said, I'm looking to build on top of these standards, and not consider WebLN a full-on replacement for these. I plan on making Joule work with W3C payments when they provide a way for me to add a payment method, and I'm looking into some ways of using 402 response codes to indicate gated content. [1] https://github.com/wbobeirne/webln/issues/1 [2] https://w3c.github.io/payment-request/#goals On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:32 AM Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com> wrote: > I do not trust anything written in JavaScript. > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:23 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> This new work looks promising >> >> https://github.com/wbobeirne/webln >> >> cc wboberine -- tl;dr some of us are hoping to try and get some >> standardization work going in the w3c payments group around the lightning >> network -- any interest? >> >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 at 11:52, Andrew Bransford Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Good idea. >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 3:16 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 18:44, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 18:30, Melvin Carvalho < >>>>> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 18:24, Michael Bumann <hello@michaelbumann.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 11:50 AM, Melvin Carvalho < >>>>>>> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 11:30, Michael Bumann < >>>>>>> hello@michaelbumann.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Melvin, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> yeah, I've been experimenting with the Bitcoin lightning network >>>>>>>> for a while and I am pretty excited about the state and how easy it is to >>>>>>>> build on top of it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, Great! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Funnily enough I was just reading your page, and realized it was you >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tim did actually a while back ask me to interact with this group >>>>>>> regarding http 402. Some work has been done on that, including by me, and >>>>>>> it would be great to compare notes at some point. Or maybe flesh out use >>>>>>> cases. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I got a bit lost in the different efforts around this topic. And >>>>>>> some seemed to me rather complicated (e.g. including standards for >>>>>>> providing invoice/shipping details) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd love to see and online equivalent of handing a coin to the >>>>>>> newspaper person and getting some content in return. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Did you see/use lightning browser extension "joule"[1]? It brings >>>>>>>> lightning payments to the browser - and there has been some discussion >>>>>>>> around supporting web payment standards - maybe somebody familiar can help? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have it installed, but dont fully understand the fine details. >>>>>>> When my casa node arrives I'll be able to try it out with my own node. But >>>>>>> I might set up a raspblitz while I wait. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let me know if you want to set it up on a server. I am happy to help, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was lead to your blog post from : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/wbobeirne/joule-extension/issues/46 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am wondering how to make it easier for content providers to >>>>>>>> integrate LN payments and also experimented with lightning payments for API >>>>>>>> requests [2]. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have written in the past working code for pay walls, with a dance >>>>>>> around http 402, and in fact that's my current use case. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you think some areas of this work flow would benefit from >>>>>>> standardization? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> as mentioned above I am not super aware of the current >>>>>>> standardization efforts and I ignored it because of simplicity with my >>>>>>> experiments. >>>>>>> I think also joule ignored it for that reason. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But yeah this must use some standard. Does anyone know how this >>>>>>> could fit into the current efforts? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> How about this simple pay wall user story for proof of concept? >>>>>> >>>>>> User Story >>>>>> <#m_4118734686060785173_m_3731727939658195170_m_6562303847656748069_m_1728713327420995450_m_-5517546107507471064_m_8143054714546802283_user-story> >>>>>> >>>>>> As a teacher, Alice wishes to make her educational notes available to >>>>>> fellow teachers. Having put a great deal of effort into it, she would wish >>>>>> to get access to different notes from other teachers in return, or put up a >>>>>> pay wall for new teachers that have not yet prepared notes. Alice will set >>>>>> the price of access, and a license indicating it is not to be shared >>>>>> further. Bob, having obtained some credits on Alice's system purchases the >>>>>> notes, and starts working on his own presentations, which he would like to >>>>>> share in a similar way >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Process >>>>>> <#m_4118734686060785173_m_3731727939658195170_m_6562303847656748069_m_1728713327420995450_m_-5517546107507471064_m_8143054714546802283_process> >>>>>> Bob's attempts to access the URI, and receives a response, HTTP 402 - >>>>>> Payment Required. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also returned is a lightning network invoice in an HTTP header. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bob pays the invoice, then Alice allows access to the article >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Request >>>>> >>>>> HTTP GET paywall.org/article.html >>>>> >>>>> Response >>>>> >>>>> HTP 402 >>>>> X-Lightning-Invoice : ln74894yiy... >>>>> Updates-Via : wss://paywall.org >>>>> >>>>> Maybe another header for the type of paywall? ie lightning mainnet. >>>>> The updates-via can be used to tell the user agent that the page is ready >>>>> to refresh. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Someone (aka basti) pointed me to the following doc saying X- headers >>>> are no longer a best practice >>>> >>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648 >>>> >>>> So perhaps we can standardize around the ln- prefix for example >>>> >>>> ln-invoice >>>> ln-grpc >>>> ln-foo >>>> ln-bar >>>> >>>> etc. ? >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With solid it's possible to access control content, and give back a >>>>>>> 4xx. We dont yet return 402s but I've custom hacked a server to do that. >>>>>>> I'm not quite sure how a server will be able to know to send a 402. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1]https://lightningjoule.com/ >>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>> http://michaelbumann.com/post/180389589277/bitcoin-lightning-machine-to-machine-api-payments >>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/bumi/ln-markdown-to-pdf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 12, 2019 6:04 PM, Melvin Carvalho < >>>>>>>> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> > I am curious if any of this group is interested in the lightning >>>>>>>> network [1]. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > For those that are unaware, it is a system built on top of block >>>>>>>> chains that allow zero cost instant payments in a zero trust environment. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > There has been lots of innovation already this year, and it seems >>>>>>>> to be growing fast. One service that impressed me is a custodial service >>>>>>>> built on top of twitter that allows you to add a tip jar based on your >>>>>>>> twitter account. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > https://tippin.me/ >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > This is a really easy way for non technical people to experience >>>>>>>> web payments and bitcoin in the browser, without the overhead of a high >>>>>>>> technical barrier to entry, or downloading a wallet. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > Additionally I have added this to my sollid profile using the the >>>>>>>> foaf : tipjar predicate that has been around for about a decade but never >>>>>>>> really used. The I have added it looks as follows : >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > In turtle : >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > </#me> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/tipjar> < >>>>>>>> https://tippin.me/@melvincarvalho> . >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > In RDFa : >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > <a target="_blank" rel="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/tipjar" href=" >>>>>>>> https://tippin.me/@melvincarvalho"> >>>>>>>> https://tippin.me/@melvincarvalho</a> >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > There are also new solutions such as a mobile wallet that >>>>>>>> receives payments (blue wallet), decentralized apps (Lapps) and ability to >>>>>>>> run your own node eg on a raspberry pi. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > If anyone is playing around in this space would love to hear from >>>>>>>> you, or if you'd like to get started and have, say a tippin me account, I'd >>>>>>>> be happy to send some satoshis (the unit of currency) to play around with. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I think this brings forth an exciting new era of instant payments >>>>>>>> in the browser. Would love to hear from anyone else that is interested in >>>>>>>> this tech. >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > [1] http://lightning.network >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2019 20:47:36 UTC