- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 01:32:00 +0000
- To: Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net>, public-webpayments@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 12 March 2017 01:32:43 UTC
On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 at 12:09 Steven Rowat <steven_rowat@sunshine.net> wrote: > On 2017-03-11 3:21 PM, Timothy Holborn wrote: > > > 2. Did Satoshi's paper coin the term 'Blockchain'[1] > > Apparently not... > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_cipher_mode_of_operation#Cipher_Block_Chaining > > "William F. Ehrsam, Carl H. W. Meyer, John L. Smith, Walter L. > Tuchman, "Message verification and transmission error detection by > block chaining", US Patent 4074066, 1976" > > That's really interesting. Thank you. I've had a long-standing problem with the use of the term 'block-chain' specifically due to : http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency dynamic as appended to "block-chain technologies". Indeed much of the advocacy pertaining to alternatives such as HTTP-SIGNATURES https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cavage-http-signatures-06 for me, is about creating a decentralised alternative (ie: every human participating with crypto instruments) as to significantly reduce the energy-consumption requirements for human-trust. (which even in the case of big data centre means of outsourcing arrangements, may not resolve the underlying problem). Tim.h > Steven > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 12 March 2017 01:32:43 UTC