- From: Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 14:57:09 -0800
- To: Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com>
- Cc: Fabio Barone <holon.earth@gmail.com>, Web Payments <public-webpayments@w3.org>, Interledger Community Group <public-interledger@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <DF00DB0D-2E72-4A5F-B1C4-2CD04F7DF24A@taoeffect.com>
Hey, at least I backup my assertions with facts. :) > To merely write us all off as 'dangerous to bitcoin' takes chutzpah, to say the least. Not so much chutzpah as extreme annoyance. Cheers, Greg > On Jan 28, 2016, at 2:53 PM, Jeffrey Cliff <jeffrey.cliff@gmail.com> wrote: > > So is that one. > > There's quite a few of us who have been banned from /r/bitcoin and not for promoting one arbitrary constant over another. To merely write us all off as 'dangerous to bitcoin' takes chutzpah, to say the least. > > On 26 January 2016 at 21:33, Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com <mailto:contact@taoeffect.com>> wrote: >> What do people here think about the potentially incumbent collapse of bitcoin as a crypto-currency itself and the block-size issue? > > I think this BS and you should stop spreading it. > > https://fixingtao.com/2016/01/point-by-point-response-to-mike-hearns-final-bitcoin-post/ <https://fixingtao.com/2016/01/point-by-point-response-to-mike-hearns-final-bitcoin-post/> > > Cheers, > Greg > >> On Jan 26, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Fabio Barone <holon.earth@gmail.com <mailto:holon.earth@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> As suggested, I am starting a new thread for this topic. >> I apologize if I am coming over as verbose and/or cluttering your inboxes. >> >> **** >> >> What do people here think about the potentially incumbent collapse of bitcoin as a crypto-currency itself and the block-size issue? >> >> The question is related to the blockchain itself, not bitcoin. >> Block size is ultimately a "political" decision of the community, and there appears to be a scism because of that. >> Not wanting to discuss that in itself (it's probably being discussed elsewhere), >> >> but what do you guys think this means for blockchain technology itself? >> >> Will we see a proliferation of different blockchains, making ILP even more interesting and important? >> >> Could this be a blow to blockchain technology itself (unlikely IMHO), because limitations of this technology are becoming apparent? >> >> What developments do you foresee happening in this field, also maybe not underestimating a potential collapse of the global economy this year? >> >> On a side note, I like Ethereum's basic tenets but I am worried about a lock-in of some sorts... >> >> > > > > > -- > GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any > forum and add 1 to the generation >
Received on Thursday, 28 January 2016 22:57:38 UTC