- From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 06:27:23 +0200
- To: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>, "public-webpayments-comments@w3.org" <public-webpayments-comments@w3.org>
One of the things I have gotten feedback on is the lack of REST in the http://xmlns.webpki.org/webpay/v1 scheme. I haven't actually thought too much about this before but after looking a bit further into the topic I believe skipping REST was a wise decision. Signed Input Data: =============== There is no obvious solution for signed input data using REST. Illogical Messaging Structures: ========================= input format https://server/path?operation=checkfunds&amount=$3.75¤cy=USD output format { "status": "ok", "sayswho": "your bank" } For the kind of systems I'm working with where messages are wrapped, dealing with two formats would greatly complicate the design and make documentation, debugging, and logging even more daunting than it already is. Multi-hop: ========= In real systems messages often have to traverse between different nodes which makes REST-like messaging awkward while transferring messages like: { "operation":"checkfunds", "amount":"3.75", "currency":"USD" } using HTTP POST is a no-brainer Anders Didn't take a REST :-)
Received on Monday, 28 September 2015 04:27:57 UTC