- From: Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:47:40 +0100
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
2015-11-03 5:33 GMT+01:00 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>: > The current approach for the WebDHT is to loosely couple identifiers and > the keys that you can use to prove that those identifiers are yours. > > For example, the WebDHT enables you to specify a set of keys or other > identifiers that should have write access to the entry in the DHT. This > means that even in the event of a key loss, you can recover that > identifier by asking people (or services) that you trust to associate a > new device/keypair with the identifier. I'm sorry if this has been mentioned already, but what you describe sounds a lot like Keybase. How does WebDHT compare to it? https://keybase.io/ -- Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- asbjorn@ulsberg.no «He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 09:48:10 UTC