- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:13:17 +0200
- To: Tony Camero <tonycamerobiz@gmail.com>
- Cc: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>, "public-webpayments@w3.org" <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhJZp8zuyxy8s3zav96n8YP9yid1=7bAP6Q+VhuJoByN0Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 18 April 2015 at 16:54, Tony Camero <tonycamerobiz@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Adrian, > I'm interested, but I'm not clear whether I can easily make a > contribution. I have rewards and gamification platform under development > for small communities that would involve the accumulation of points for > value given online and/or offline. We have a working model on the bench > that may warrant some dusting off. it's intended that these points can then > be distributed in private transactions (at will) ... P2p c2b et al. > Im also interested in any payments work best based on web standards (particularly linked data). By coincidence my motivation is also a gasification system that involves the accumulation of points. Tony, if you're interested in comparing notes, perhaps we could continue this conversation off-list. > > Would this qualify as "Value Web"? > > Would it be an interesting laboratory/case for this TF ? > > The front end native app needs to be rewritten but the back end tables for > all the different actors in the system and back end admin is > essentially all in place. I'd need to get it staged to be useful to the TF, > if you think there is value. > > > > > On Saturday, April 18, 2015, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Melvin, Steven, (CC: Web payments IG) >> >> Ripple Labs are co-ordinating the formation of a Web Settlement Task >> Force as part of the Web Payments IG. The purpose of this task force is to >> identify a way to realise what we are calling, the Value Web or Internet of >> Value. We want to ultimately get to a place were we are not simply >> exchanging messages and promises online but exchanging real value. >> Obviously value can't be digitised and sent across the wire so what this >> really translates to is immediate, final and irrevocable settlement as a >> final step in the payments process. >> >> In parallel to the other work being done in the IG, which is mostly >> focused on using Web technology to integrate existing legacy payments >> systems and making it easy for payments to be done on the Web, I'd like the >> Settlement TF to be thinking about how we can build standards around >> immediate settlement systems (of which I'd consider the Bitcoin ledger >> one). This means getting a wider variety of contributors and voices than >> just Ripple Lab's as part of the TF. I'd certainly value your contributions >> and ideas. >> >> The plan is to spend the build-up to the Web Payments IG F2F in June to >> recruit contributors and agree on a plan of actions for the F2F itself and >> some sort of roadmap for the months ahead. >> >> I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this initiative and hear from >> anyone that would like to be involved. >> >> Adrian >> >> On 18 April 2015 at 12:55, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 18 April 2015 at 06:16, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/16/2015 08:21 PM, Steven Rowat wrote: >>>> > I admit my reasoning there seems a bit speculative (in fact, >>>> > hot-headed), and towards the conspiracy theory end of the continuum >>>> > -- but, now Melvin's come back with some data that supports it; thank >>>> > you. ;-) >>>> > >>>> > And even having calmed down, I'm still thinking that shunting off >>>> > the simplest A->B payments between two people as 'Future Work' is a >>>> > mistake (and a slightly suspicious one). >>>> >>>> Let me try and explain why those of us that are involved in this work >>>> are nervous about working on peer-to-peer payments. >>>> >>>> The Web Payments IG is still working through the person-to-person >>>> payments scenarios. The technology for p2p payments is incredibly >>>> simple, but the regulation around it is fantastically complex and >>>> expensive to comply with. The price for misreading the regulation is >>>> extremely steep. You can read more about it here: >>>> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_transmitter >>>> >>>> Here's why work in the area is going slowly: >>>> >>>> It is a felony to engage in money transmission without a license in any >>>> state that requires a license to operate. >>>> >>>> I remember being a speaker at a conference with Charlie Shrem keynoting >>>> a few years ago. A year later, Charlie was in jail. Granted, he also did >>>> some other shady stuff, but one of the charges filed against him was >>>> operating without a money transmission license (aka doing peer-to-peer >>>> payments w/o being licensed to do so). >>>> >>>> There are really no other technologies that W3C is working on where a >>>> mistake can land you in jail. Accidentally inject a bug in HTML5 - >>>> people get angry. Badly designed feature for CSS3? Developers are >>>> annoyed. Botch a crypto implementation - millions of dollars in damages, >>>> but not much else. Screw up the deployment of peer-to-peer payments at >>>> your organization? *Felony and jail time*. >>>> >>>> When you say you're going to work on "peer-to-peer payments", what >>>> you're really saying is: "I'm going to try and work on this problem >>>> knowing that there is a possibility of someone I'm working with (or me) >>>> ending up in jail." >>>> >>>> Personally, I imagine being ripped away from my wife and two young kids >>>> for writing a spec, a couple hundred lines of code, and deploying it >>>> into production... and all the program did was move a virtual thing from >>>> one ledger to another. >>>> >>>> So, that's what's in the back of some of our minds while working on the >>>> peer-to-peer payments stuff... and that's why it's going slowly. We >>>> don't want to make a mistake. >>>> >>>> That said, many in the group want to see peer-to-peer payments succeed. >>>> The Use Cases document has clearly put Bitcoin (a peer-to-peer payment >>>> mechanism) in there as something that we want to support: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-web-payments-use-cases-20150416/#cryptocurrency-payment-bitcoin-ripple >>>> >>>> So, it's in scope and we're trying to move on it as fast as we can. The >>>> problem is in deploying it into production. In order to do that at any >>>> kind of significant level, you need a heavily capitalized organization >>>> (like a bank) that's willing to deploy a new payment system and take the >>>> regulatory heat (tens of millions of dollars in fines) when things go >>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> Purchases are far less heavily regulated and much easier to standardize >>>> and put into production without risking jail time or stratospheric >>>> fines. That's one of the reasons the group is gravitating towards those. >>>> The other reason is that purchases constitute far more economic activity >>>> than peer-to-peer payments do. >>>> >>>> Steven, I suggest you tell the Web Payments IG that you think that the >>>> group is making a mistake by not taking peer-to-peer payments more >>>> seriously. It'll be a review comment, and per W3C process, we're very >>>> strongly urged to respond to you. That will force the Web Payments IG to >>>> have a discussion about it, on the record, and get back to you. >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#wide-review >>>> http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#formal-address >>>> >>> >>> Thanks for the perspective, Manu. I suspect satoshi had similar >>> concerns with bitcoin. But we've seen bitcoin get more mainstream >>> acceptance, with even the NYSE making it's first investment in over 100 >>> years in that space. A quote from Harvard professor and former chief >>> economist of the world bank, Larry summers: >>> >>> “The price of handling bits [of data]has come down by a factor of 10,000 >>> fold over the last generation; it’s high time that the costs of payments >>> processing fall by a factor of even two,” says former U.S. Treasury >>> Secretary Lawrence H. Summers. “Bitcoin offers the prospect of necessary >>> and important disruption in finance for the benefit of buyers and sellers >>> rather than financiers and middlemen.” >>> >>> I would argue that the web offers the same potential. It's possible to >>> misuse, for example, blogging software, which uses specs such as HTTP, but >>> the authors of the blogging software, or specs should not be liable. >>> >>> Regarding regulators, those I have spoken to, want to see innovation >>> driving down costs, particularly in areas such as remittance which has >>> average 9% transaction fees. This would help some of the poorest people in >>> the world. When sending money home to help your family (perhaps even in a >>> life saving way) you're not purchasing anything. >>> >>> If regulation is an issue, or causing a chilling effect, I would suggest >>> working with bitcoin testnet coins, which are designed to be worthless, but >>> have all the technical properties of crypto currencies, and none of the >>> risks. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> HTH, >>>> >>>> -- manu >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) >>>> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. >>>> blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments >>>> http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>
Received on Saturday, 18 April 2015 15:13:45 UTC