- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 19:12:44 -0400
- To: public-webpayments@w3.org
On 09/21/2014 04:50 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 9/21/14 3:08 PM, Dave Lampton wrote: >> To say we've always had linked data is kind of silly, I think. A >> cop-out, indeed. >> >> From day 1 the proposal back in 1989 was of an information system >> where data is linked. > > The point is simply this: Linked Data has always been part of the > Web. That's been a fact, since inception. This is request to move this discussion to another mailing list (like the Semantic Web Interest Group[1]) that is meant for what this thread is turning into; a discussion of the history of Linked Data and what the terminology means. Discussion around how Web Payments and Credentials use Linked Data is certainly in scope, but discussion about Web history (even though its important to understand) should be done in a more appropriate forum. The original post in this thread was just a heads-up about a presentation given at SemTech about the Web Payments and Credentials work. It wasn't meant to spawn what looks like a perma-thread in the making about whether or not Linked Data was a part of the original Web's design (based on a varying set of definitions of "Linked Data", "part of", and "original"). :) -- manu [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/ -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2014 23:13:14 UTC