- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 21:33:57 -0400
- To: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
On 09/11/2014 08:50 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: > Although it may be a bit early reviewing a conference before it is > over I believe that I'm in confidence can tell that the FIDO and > WebCrypto folks are not particularly into the distributed (but > interconnected) web. > > They rather emphasize that replacing userid/passwords is their main > goal and that privacy requires that you have a unique relationship > (key-wise) with each domain. Mozilla and Google show no interest in > the existing (and in Europe and Asia relatively successful) eID > use-cases where you indeed can use the same credential on multiple > sites. This is all really helpful, thanks for the update Anders. > This is a problem since these implementations rely on browser > plugins which soon will be "outlawed" which have forced (for example) > the banks in Sweden to switch to native applications to cope with > this issue. > > I'm personally moderately convinced that WebCrypto and FIDO actually > address privacy (except on paper) because it is basically > impossible doing anything serious on the web without having a > validated e-mail address which means that service providers get a > Globally Unique (fairly) Static ID which also is Searchable and is > Exposed in communication with other people. That is, the NSA and > other spying entities already have the perfect electronic handle to > individuals. Yeah, seems like FIDO's greatest contribution is the elimination of username/password. The Credentials work is designed to layer on top, so we can still accomplish all of this. > In reality FIDO will rather strengthen the super-providers' offers > since FIDO doesn't support an improved payment system for a > distributed set of banks of the kind I'm targeting. The > user-experience for such a use-case is simply put very bad while > Apple, Google and Paypal will look both wonderful and be secure. Keep in mind that FIDO + some sort of credential provider can still provide the mechanism you're talking about pretty simply. In fact, that's the approach that the Credentials specs take. FIDO to do good 2-factor auth, then the Credentials process takes over to deliver trustworthy 3rd party credentials. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Marathonic Dawn of Web Payments http://manu.sporny.org/2014/dawn-of-web-payments/
Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 01:34:27 UTC