+1 Thank you Ars longa, vita brevis... On Sep 9, 2014, at 8:29 AM, "Stephane Boyera" <boyera@w3.org<mailto:boyera@w3.org>> wrote: Hi Manu, Joseph, All Given that there seems to be a consensus on removing non-fiat. I'm happy to proceed. The easiest, at a first glance, is to just remove the term and not open another can of worms by adding a new term. I believe that the idea is very well conveyed and I feel we don't need to go further. I implemented this change (removing the problematic term). cheers Steph Le 09/09/2014 03:28, Manu Sporny a écrit : On 09/01/2014 12:30 PM, Joseph Potvin wrote: RE: Doesn’t fiat imply government? If what's intended in that section of the Charter is to say "stateless currencies", then some variant of this phrase would be better. But would "Berkshares" that (I think) involve a regional government and some municipalites in Massachussetts be inside our outside that concept? http://www.berkshares.org/community_industry +1 to removing non-fiat. Perhaps changing it to "private currencies"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_currency -- manu -- Stephane Boyera stephane@w3.org<mailto:stephane@w3.org> W3C +33 (0) 6 73 84 87 27 BP 93 F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France ________________________________ This electronic message, including attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or company named above or to which it is addressed. The information contained in this message shall be considered confidential and proprietary, and may include confidential work product. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and deleting this email immediately.
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2014 06:44:03 UTC