- From: Nate Otto <nate@ottonomy.net>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 01:36:59 +0000
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:37:26 UTC
> > How you pay for that offer of sale is orthogonal. From a technical > standpoint, this creates a nice separation of concerns. Each problem > neatly in its own space. > Well put. I think I agree with most or all loyalty schemes just needing the first of your two types. One example that a couple local growler-filling stations use for a shared loyalty card is Fivestars where points accrue, but the card itself is still just a simple identity credential. Points are granted, read, and spent through API calls to the central loyalty service, which doesn't mean they need to be transmitted as a credential. I'm not sure exactly what the shared incentives are that might encourage businesses to join this network, whether there actually is any currency that trades hands if a consumer earns all their points at one store and spends them at another. But either way, the potential fake currency may all just be handled by the central service and still doesn't ever need to change hands. Nate
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:37:26 UTC