- From: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 11:50:11 -0500
- To: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Cc: Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKcXiSrB4ozFZwwC-RnaL-_NJ=ikWZKzgSmjxQQc-_AKqmJYjg@mail.gmail.com>
Brent, I'm interested in the common technical transaction patterns that show up in application source code structure, at this level: http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/writingPatterns.html http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Software_Engineering/Architecture/Design_Patterns When I said "high-level comparison of the mechanics of transactions" I didn't mean as high level as use cases. I meant "developers' technical guide" level. Joseph On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> wrote: > Joseph, > > Here is a large body of information I produced earlier this year. It has a > lot of links that may relate to what you are seeking. > > https://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/WebPaymentsUseCases_r1 > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 2, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > > RE: "What would happen within this column, and in what order, will need to > be the same for each payment method, I reckon." > > Oops. Correction: "Some essentials for what would happen within this > column will be the same for each payment method, but their order and > various optional features and functions can differ." > > Joseph > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > >> Has anyone on this list come across (or co-produced) a high-level >> comparison of the mechanics of transactions within the different payments' >> software systems: debit card, credit card, automated clearing house (incl. >> direct deposit), wire transfer, giro, ripple, blockchain systems? What I >> have in mind are comparable class diagrams and activity (swimlane) diagrams >> for each. >> >> I think what I'm imagining is something like a "Web Payment Software >> Design Patterns" collection. >> >> If a functional systems comparison isn't available presently, does anyone >> else on this list think such a collection would be useful? For my own work, >> such a diagrammatic taxonomy will be useful. If it's not yet started, I'll >> do so. >> >> It seems to me that a comparable set of system-level diagrams in this >> form would be useful towards advancing common undestanding about the >> contibutions and limitations of a W3C specification on web payments. For >> example, in the various activity diagrams, the generic "browser" would >> occupy one of the swimlanes. What would happen within this column, and in >> what order, will need to be the same for each payment method, I reckon. For >> the various class diagrams, there would be a package that expresses the >> scope of the W3C specification, which contains a set of classes with their >> respective sets of attributes. >> >> Useful? Not useful? >> >> -- >> >> >> Joseph Potvin, M.Phil. MCPM >> Doctoral Candidate, Project Management >> Université du Québec >> >> Chair, OSI Management Education Working Group >> >> Coordinator, The FLOW Syllabus >> http://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Projects/flow-syllabus >> >> The Open Source Initiative >> >> Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations >> The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman >> jpotvin@opman.ca >> Mobile: 819-593-5983 >> > > > > -- Joseph Potvin Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman jpotvin@opman.ca Mobile: 819-593-5983
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2014 16:50:59 UTC