- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:00:15 +1000
- To: Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca>
- Cc: Poor Richard <poor.ricardo@gmail.com>, Web Payments CG <public-webpayments@w3.org>, Andrew Mackie <andrew@supplydemand.info>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok3sDUL8-x0pNKeRhAvR_eqKfe_987eC9Y5RsH8hKtxj8g@mail.gmail.com>
On 14 May 2014 10:31, Joseph Potvin <jpotvin@opman.ca> wrote: > Richard, > > A digital commodity such as a bitcoin is divisible but not editable. A > digital literary work is both divisible and editable. There are ways > to automate some rights tracking: > > http://osi.xwiki.com/bin/Projects/draft-flow-syllabus#HManagementofIntellectualProvenance28IP29Responsibilities > > Heritage and copyright principles cover these areas rather well... These principles can be described in RDF. http://creativecommons.org/ns is a good example of a tool that can be used towards these ends. it currently doesn't provide an 'offer' statement for use outside of the explicitly defined license however. I believe Andrew Mackie has been working on this 'offer' consideration. IMHO, Eco-systems work in a distributed / decentralised build; but wouldn't work for any specific organisation seeking to build a better funnel (from a service provision point of view). Effectively, these systems need a vast majority to build consensus systems; therein, using the same, similar or translatable language services, for the core service provisioning platform (being, web-scale). > The issue of what is a derivative work is a matter of reasoned > judgement, so I would recommend that the generic use case is best left > to people to determine. > > Joseph Potvin > Operations Manager, The Opman Company > jpotvin@opman.ca > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Poor Richard <poor.ricardo@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello RWW and Web Payments CG, > > > > Can bitcoin-style block chain protocols support an alternative form of > > intellectual property and personal data management? For example, > whenever we > > create social media content or provide personal data, our > > authorship/ownership of that digital material and the publishing > transaction > > might be documented via some block chain protocol. Besides a "timestamp" > any > > thing we post might get an automatic "authorship" stamp (and optionally > an > > ownership rights stamp) that would follow that data forever. > > > > What about a similar approach to micropayments? > > > > Both of these applications would beg the question, what is the minimal > > viable block chain for the level of security required -- becuase the > number > > of transactions might be in the billions per day. > > > > PR > > > > > > > > -- > Joseph Potvin > Operations Manager | Gestionnaire des opérations > The Opman Company | La compagnie Opman > http://www.projectmanagementhotel.com/projects/opman-portfolio > jpotvin@opman.ca > Mobile: 819-593-5983 > LinkedIn (Google short URL): http://goo.gl/Ssp56 > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2014 01:00:46 UTC