- From: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:26:23 -0500
- To: Natasha Rooney <nrooney@gsma.com>
- Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, "public-webpayments@w3.org" <public-webpayments@w3.org>, W3C Payments Workshop PC <group-payment-workshop-pc@w3.org>, W3C Webmob Public <public-web-mobile@w3.org>, David Newton <david@davidnewton.ca>
- Message-ID: <CACvcBVoMGpMb39dEnZ0UALwjn_EVTCORPUsZHBbazFTS_2mrDA@mail.gmail.com>
Natasha, I have my own fork of the payments-use-cases at https://github.com/bshambaugh/payments-use-case<https://github.com/bshambaugh/payments-use-cases> s. Right now it is serving as my scratch pad. I tried sending a pull request to webmob "pull request 1" to see if you would get it. This is not the final version. I hope this helps! -Brent On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Natasha Rooney <nrooney@gsma.com> wrote: > Brent - could you add to the github repo instead? This will allow us to > have all information in the same place! > > Thanks! > > Natasha Rooney | Web Technologist | GSMA | nrooney@gsma.com | +44 (0) > 7730 219 765 | @thisNatasha | Skype: nrooney@gsm.org > > 7th Floor, 5 New Street Square, London EC4A 3BF > > > From: Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com> > Date: Thursday, 13 March 2014 16:16 > To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> > Cc: "public-webpayments@w3.org" <public-webpayments@w3.org>, Natasha > Rooney <nrooney@gsma.com>, W3C Payments Workshop PC < > group-payment-workshop-pc@w3.org>, W3C Webmob Public < > public-web-mobile@w3.org>, David Newton <david@davidnewton.ca> > Subject: Re: [W3C Webmob] Payments Use Cases: Pulled in Payments CG work > > Hi all, > > I am adding more information in the same form as before to the wiki ( > https://www.w3.org/community/webpayments/wiki/WebPaymentsMobileUseCases). > Right now it is the GoCardless section. I've read what you have put up. My > current plan is to perform a second iteration to address these concerns. > > -Brent > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On March 13, 2014 at 8:07:08 AM, Natasha Rooney (nrooney@gsma.com) wrote: >> > Hi all! >> > >> > The web payments use cases work conducted by the Payments CG has been >> pulled into the "Payments >> > Use Cases" Github Repo. >> > >> > https://github.com/w3c-webmob/payments-use-cases >> > >> > There are some bits and pieces of information missing, we would >> appreciate if you could >> > take a look and raise issues / create pull requests for the information >> we are still missing. >> > If you have an problems with doing either of these please let me know, >> I am here to help! >> > >> > Furthermore we have more issues for this repo as detailed ( >> https://github.com/w3c-webmob/payments-use-cases/issues), >> > please take a look and work on them if you can. >> >> It might be good if we take all the bits that are unfinished and convert >> them into bugs. Otherwise, we just end up with a big document with lots of >> TODOs but very little useful content (what we currently have, >> unfortunately). >> >> Also, the "use cases" that are currently listed are not really use cases... >> they are more features that each service claims to provide. What would be >> more useful is to understand (i.e., actually *see* or experience) how these >> services are made available on a mobile device. The user experience of >> those features is what is actually important - and how payments are made >> secure and how users are able to access and understand those options and >> make purchases using their devices. That's not clear at all at the moment. >> >> What I propose is that we first make a list of what, for each service >> listed, we want to show/answer. Like, how does the user: >> >> * add real money to the service? >> * buy a physical good in the real world (e.g., a cup of coffee)? >> * pay for physical service (e.g., gym membership)? >> * convert virtual money back into paper money? >> * transfer money from one person to another (even if the second person is >> not signed up for the service)? >> * buy a product online? >> * resolve disputes? >> * view transactions? >> * secure the wallet? >> * etc. >> >> I'm sure there are a bunch of other good questions. We should probably >> limit them to about 10 to make this project tangible. >> >> -- >> Marcos Caceres >> >> > This email and its attachments are intended for the above named only > and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error you must take no > action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please > reply to this email or call +44 207 356 0600 and highlight the error. >
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 14:26:52 UTC